Comparison of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy corneas with symmetric and asymmetric bow-tie topographic pattern with inferior and superior steepening.

PURPOSE: To compare the corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy corneas with symmetric and asymmetric bow-tie topographic patterns. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 144 eyes were divided based on inferior-superior asymmetry value (I-S) into symmetric (zero I-S: - 0.50 to + 0.50 D) and asymmetric bow-tie topographic patterns with inferior (positive I-S: + 0.51 to + 1.4 D) or superior (negative I-S: - 2.5 to - 0.51 D) steepening. The biomechanical assessment was performed using Corvis ST and ocular response analyzer (ORA). A general linear model univariate analysis was used to compare the parameters, while the central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and age were considered covariates. RESULTS: Only the peak distance (PD) at the highest concavity phase (P = 0.007) and tomographic biomechanical index (TBI, P = 0.001) showed statistically significant differences between the three groups. For TBI, this difference was statistically significant between the positive I-S group separately with the zero I-S group (P < 0.001), and with the negative I-S group (P = 0.022). For PD, the significant difference was between the negative I-S group separately with zero I-S (P = 0.019), and positive I-S groups (P = 0.018). There was a statistically significant correlation between the I-S value with PD (r = 0.281, P = 0.001) and TBI (r = 0.170, P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Most corneal biomechanical parameters are not statistically significant compared to the zero I-S group. However, superior steepening is associated with a stiffer response based solely on the shorter PD values seen in this group, and the group with the inferior steepening shows the highest or more suspicious values based on TBI.

Peripapillary vessel density in healthy people, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal-tension glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare peripapillary vessel density using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in eyes of healthy people, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). METHODS: Thirty patients with POAG, 27 patients with NTG, and 29 healthy individuals in the control group were assessed. Capillary vessels in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) represented by whole image RPC (radial peripapillary capillary) density in an AngioDisc scan 4.5 × 4.5 mm centered on the optic disc, and ONH morphological variables (disc area, rim area, cup to disc area ratio (CDR)), and average peripapillary RNFL thickness were measured. RESULTS: Differences in mean RPC, RNFL, disc area, rim area, and CDR between the groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The difference in RNFL thickness and rim area was not significant between NTG and healthy groups, while RPC and CDR showed a statistically significant difference between all pairs. The vessel density in the POAG group was 8.25% and 11.7% lower compared to the NTG and healthy groups, respectively; while the mean difference was less (2.97%) for the NTG and healthy group. In the POAG group, 67.2% of the variation in RPC can be explained by a model containing CDR and RNFL thickness, and in normal eyes 38.8% of the changes using a model containing RNFL. CONCLUSION: The peripapillary vessel density is reduced in both types of glaucoma. The vessel density in NTG was significantly lower than in the healthy eyes, despite the lack of significant difference in RNFL thickness and neuroretinal rim area between them.

Impact of a 50bp insertion/deletion polymorphism of the superoxide dismutase-1 on oxidative stress status and risk of keratoconus.

Keratoconus (KC) is characterized by the predominant primary ectatic disease, affecting the cornea, necessitating corneal transplants in some cases. While some loci associated with KC risk have been identified, the understanding of the disease remains limited. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes play a crucial role in countering the reactive oxygen species and providing protection against oxidative stress (OS). Accordingly, the objective of this study was to investigate a potential association of a 50 nucleotide base pairs (bp) insertion/deletion (I/D) within the SOD1 promoter, and the located 1684 bp upstream of the SOD1 ATG, with KC in the Iranian population. Additionally, an assessment was conducted on SOD activity and the total antioxidant capacity (TAC), as determined by the ferric reducing-antioxidant power assay, along with malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. In this case-control study, genomic DNA was extracted from the blood cells of KC (n = 402) and healthy (n = 331) individuals. The genotype of this gene was determined using the PCR technique. Furthermore, the amount of SOD enzyme activity and the MDA and TAC levels were measured in the serum of the study groups. The (I/I) genotype was present in 84.23%, the (I/D) genotype in 15.06%, and the (D/D) genotype in 0.69% of both groups. A statistically significant relationship was seen between different genotypes and TAC, MDA, and SOD1 activity indices (P < 0.05). Individuals with the D/D genotype exhibited a decrease in total antioxidant capacity, an increase in the amount of MDA, and a decrease in SOD1 enzyme activity (P < 0.05). Moreover, the logistic regression analysis of KC development indicated that elevated levels of MDA increased the risk of KC incidence in the patient group compared to the healthy group, while a higher activity of SOD1 and greater values of TAC decreased the KC risk. The removal of the 50 bp fragment reduced SOD1 activity and elevated OS levels, thereby impacting the oxidant-antioxidant balance. This could potentially play a significant role in individuals afflicted by KC.

After-effect on tear film quality and quantity of reading on laptop computer screen versus hardcopy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Electronic displays, including laptops, tablets, and smartphones, have dramatically altered the way information is accessed and become significant factors in human daily life. They interfere with the blink rate and increase dry eye symptoms, which lead to more discomfort compared to hard copy while reading. BACKGROUND: Digital eye strain occurs when an individual suffers from symptoms, or they are exacerbated, while performing a task requiring digital screen viewing. This study assessed the tear film status immediately following reading on a laptop computer screen versus an identical hard copy. METHODS: Thirty young adults with normal ocular health and reporting no significant symptoms of dry eye (ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score < 13 and non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT) > 10 seconds) read a text as hard copy and on a laptop computer screen for 30 min on separate days in a random sequence in a controlled reading experimental condition. The texts were matched in size and contrast and presented at a viewing distance of 40 cm. The NITBUT and strip meniscometry tube tests were administered at baseline and after reading in both conditions. RESULTS: The median baseline NITBUT decreased from 13.0 s to 10.0 s (P < 0.001) after hardcopy reading and to 7.0 (P < 0.001) after reading from a laptop computer screen, with a significant difference between the task medium (P = 0.001). The baseline strip meniscometry tube results decreased from 6.7 mm to 5.0 mm (P < 0.001) after hardcopy reading and to 5.0 mm (P < 0.001) after reading from a laptop computer screen, but there was no significant difference with the task medium (P = 0.085). CONCLUSION: Reading in both conditions led to tear film instability in terms of the tear film quality and quantity. Additionally, the computer screen has a greater impact on the TBUT compared to hardcopy reading, while these two reading mediums had a similar effect on the tear volume.

The Combined Utilization of Epithelial Thickness Mapping and Tomography in Keratorefractive Surgery Screening: One Imaging Modality is Not Sufficient.

Increasing popularity and utility of epithelial thickness mapping (ETM) in keratorefractive surgery screening may begin to inappropriately devalue the use of tomography. An increasing body of research suggests that the interpretation of ETM based solely on the corneal resurfacing function may be insufficient to screen and select patients for refractive surgery. ETM and tomography are complementary and, when used together, may provide the safest and most optimal tools for keratorefractive surgery screening.

Changes in corneal biomechanical parameters in keratoconus eyes with various severities after corneal cross-linking (CXL): A comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare changes in corneal biomechanical parameters one year after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus (KCN) eyes of different severities. METHODS: Seventy-five eyes with mild, moderate, and severe grades of KCN (n = 24, 31, and 20 eyes, respectively) that were treated with CXL, based upon the standard Dresden protocol, were included. The corneal biomechanical assessment was performed using Corvis ST and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Changes in Corvis's dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters and ORA's derived parameters (corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF)) were assessed whilst the corneal thickness and intraocular pressure were considered as covariates. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the corneal biomechanical parameters obtained using both devices after surgery separately in different KCN grades, except for the deformation amplitude (DA) in the severe KCN group (P = 0.017). Changes in the classic parameters of the highest concavity phase of Corvis ST (peak distance, radius, and DA) were more positive and in the newer parameters (integrated inverse radius (IIR), deformation amplitude ratio (DAR)) more negative in the severe group compared to the other groups. Also, the mean change in CH (P = 0.710), and CRF (P = 0.565), showed a negative shift in higher grades of KCN; however, there was no significant difference in the mean changes of all parameters between different groups. (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Similar changes in the Corvis ST and ORA parameters in mild, moderate, and severe KCN indicate biomechanical stability and the effective role of CXL in stopping the progressive nature of keratoconus in eyes of varying severities one year after CXL.

Detection ability of corneal biomechanical parameters for early diagnosis of ectasia.

PURPOSE: To assess the detection ability of corneal biomechanical parameters for early diagnosis of ectasia. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive-analytical study included 134 normal eyes (control group) from 134 healthy subjects and 128 eyes with asymmetric contralateral corneal ectasia with normal topography (ACE-NT, study group) from 128 subjects with definite keratoconus in the opposite eye. Placido-disk-based corneal topography with TMS-4, Scheimpflug corneal tomography with Pentacam HR, and corneal biomechanical assessment with Corvis ST and ocular response analyzer (ORA) were performed. A general linear model was used to compare Corvis ST and ORA biomechanical parameters between groups, while central corneal thickness (CCT) and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) were considered covariates. Receiving operator sensitivity curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the cut-off point with the highest sensitivity and specificity along with the area under the curve (AUC) for each parameter. RESULT: All parameters of Corvis ST and ORA showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups except for the first (P = 0.865) and second (P = 0.226) applanation lengths, and deformation amplitude (P = 0.936). The discriminative analysis of corneal biomechanical showed that the highest accuracy for the classic, new, and combined parameters of Corvis ST was related to HCR (AUC: 0.766), IR & DAR (0.846), and TBI (0.966), respectively. Using ORA, the corneal resistance factor (0.866) had a higher detection ability than corneal hysteresis (0.826). CONCLUSIONS: TBI has the best accuracy and the highest effect size for differential diagnosis of normal from ACE-NT eyes with a cut-off point of 0.24.

Optimized Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Ectasia Detection Using Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Data.

PURPOSE: To optimize artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to integrate Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanics to enhance ectasia detection. DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional case-control retrospective study. METHODS: A total of 3886 unoperated eyes from 3412 patients had Pentacam and Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) examinations. The database included 1 eye randomly selected from 1680 normal patients (N) and from 1181 "bilateral" keratoconus (KC) patients, along with 551 normal topography eyes from patients with very asymmetric ectasia (VAE-NT), and their 474 unoperated ectatic (VAE-E) eyes. The current TBIv1 (tomographic-biomechanical index) was tested, and an optimized AI algorithm was developed for augmenting accuracy. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the TBIv1 for discriminating clinical ectasia (KC and VAE-E) was 0.999 (98.5% sensitivity; 98.6% specificity [cutoff: 0.5]), and for VAE-NT, 0.899 (76% sensitivity; 89.1% specificity [cutoff: 0.29]). A novel random forest algorithm (TBIv2), developed with 18 features in 156 trees using 10-fold cross-validation, had a significantly higher AUC (0.945; DeLong, P < .0001) for detecting VAE-NT (84.4% sensitivity and 90.1% specificity; cutoff: 0.43; DeLong, P < .0001) and a similar AUC for clinical ectasia (0.999; DeLong, P = .818; 98.7% sensitivity; 99.2% specificity [cutoff: 0.8]). Considering all cases, the TBIv2 had a higher AUC (0.985) than TBIv1 (0.974; DeLong, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: AI optimization to integrate Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments augments accuracy for ectasia detection, characterizing ectasia susceptibility in the diverse VAE-NT group. Some patients with VAE may have true unilateral ectasia. Machine learning considering additional data, including epithelial thickness or other parameters from multimodal refractive imaging, will continuously enhance accuracy. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in healthy thin corneas with matched keratoconus eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare corneal biomechanical parameters of normal thin corneas with matched keratoconus eyes. SETTING: Eye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparative study. METHODS: Dynamic corneal response parameters of Corvis ST were compared in 61 eyes with keratoconus with 61 matched healthy thin corneas (corneal thinnest point <500 µm), while corneal thickness, biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure, and age were considered covariates. The receiving operator sensitivity curve analysis was used to determine the cutoff point with the highest sensitivity and specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) for each parameter. RESULTS: All biomechanical parameters were statistically significant between the 2 groups except for the first ( P = .947) and second ( P = .582) applanation length, first ( P = .783) and second ( P = .301) applanation velocity, and deformation amplitude in the highest concavity phase ( P = .106). The highest mean difference between groups (12.89 ± 2.03 mm Hg/mm) was related to the stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SPA1). Although the Corvis biomechanical index and tomographic biomechanical index had the highest detection ability based on their AUC (0.912 and 0.959, respectively), among the standard and combined biomechanical parameters except for keratoconus screening parameters, the highest discriminative ability was related to SPA1 with AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.793, 60.66%, and 90.16%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Keratoconus corneas were significantly softer compared with healthy thin corneas of matched thickness. Optimal cutoff points close to the maximum value defined for screening parameters limit their clinical use for differentiation purposes in these particular types of cases.

Changes in Stress-Strain Index and Corneal Biomechanics in Granular Corneal Dystrophy.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess stress-strain index (SSI) and corneal biomechanical parameters in eyes with granular corneal dystrophy (GCD). Methods: This case-control study included 12 eyes of 12 patients with GCD (mean age 45.2 ± 18.7 years) and 20 eyes of 20 healthy individuals (mean age 54.4 ± 3.8 years). In addition to SSI, dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters were assessed at the first and second applanation, including length (AL1, AL2), velocity (AV1, AV2), time (AT1, AT2), and deformation amplitude (DA A1, DA A2), and at the highest concavity (HC) phase, including DA, peak distance (PD), radius (HCR), and DA ratio (DAR 1 and 2 mm), by Corvis ST. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) were considered covariates in comparing DCR parameters between the two groups. Results: SSI was statistically significantly lower in eyes with GCD than in normal eyes (p = 0.04). The corneal velocity towards the first applanation was 0.02 m/s faster in the GCD eyes AV1 (0.15 ± 0.02 vs. 0.13 ± 0.02 m/s, p < 0.001) and IR (7.48 ± 1.01 vs. 6.80 ± 1.22 mm, p = 0.003) parameters were significantly higher in the GDC group, while AT1 (7.33 ± 0.66 vs. 7.47 ± 0.36 ms, p = 0.002) and HCR (7.42 ± 0.76 vs. 8.20 ± 1.08 mm, p = 0.014) were significantly lower in the normal group. Conclusions: GCD led to a change in biomechanical properties of the cornea. SSI refers to fewer stiff corneas in GDC than normal.

Distribution Pattern of Total Corneal Thickness in Keratoconus versus Normal Eyes Using an Optical Coherence Tomography.

Purpose: To evaluate the total corneal thickness distribution pattern using a high-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (HR SD-OCT) for distinguishing normal eyes from keratoconus (KCN). Methods: One hundred and forty-four patients were enrolled in three groups (55 normal, 45 mild KCN, and 44 moderate-to-severe KCN eyes) in this prospective diagnostic test study. Total corneal thickness was measured in 8 semi-meridians using HR SD-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) in 5 and 7 mm zones. The central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal focal thinning (minimum thickness [Min], min minus median and maximum [Min-Med, Min-Max]), and asymmetry indices (inferior minus superior [I-S] and supranasal minus infratemporal [SN-IT]) were calculated. One-way analysis of variance and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used for the analysis. Results: Thinner CCT, lower Min thickness, more negative Min-Max, Min-Med, and greater I-S and SN-IT were found in KCN eyes compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The inferior and IT semi-meridians were the thinnest locations in KCN cases in the 5 mm central zone (P < 0.001). CCT followed by Min-Med had the highest discriminative ability for differentiating mild KCN (AUC, sensitivity and specificity: 0.822, 87.0%, 60.37% and 0.805, 82.93%, 66.0%, respectively) and moderate-to-severe KCN (0.902, 87.82%, 73.08% and 0.892, 85.37%, and 78.85%, respectively) from normal corneas. Conclusion: The inferior and IT sectors of the cornea with the largest thickness changes in the 5 mm zone are the most common thinning sites in keratoconic corneas, and CCT and Min-Med are the most sensitive indices for the diagnosis of KCN.

Acute Hydrops with Total Corneal Edema in a Very Young Child with Keratoconus: The Youngest Age Reported Case.

Purpose: To present the youngest age ever reported for acute corneal hydrops with total corneal edema in a child with advanced bilateral keratoconus. Methods: Patient presentation in ophthalmic clinic. The patient underwent various clinical tests and examinations including anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and Scheimpflug corneal tomography. Results: A 5-year-old girl presented with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 0.4 in the right eye and nonmeasurable UDVA associated with severe photophobia in her left eye of a 3-day duration. Intraocular pressure using the iCare tonometer was 14 and 5 mmHg in the right and left eyes, respectively. An old corneal hydrops scar and posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC) in the right eye and a total limbus to limbus corneal hydrops in the left eye were observed on slit-lamp examinations. Scheimpflug corneal tomography was possible in the right eye but, due to excessive irregularity and scaring, was not possible in the left eye. Corneal thinning and scarring were evident in the anterior segment optical coherence tomography in the right eye and very edematous cornea associated with stromal cleft and epithelial bullae in the left eye. A management plan consisting of topical hypertonic solution and ointment was started to reduce her symptoms. Conclusion: Acute corneal hydrops may be the presenting sign of keratoconus; however, extensive hydrops involving the total cornea area at a very young age is very rare and has not been previously reported in the literature.

Comparison of Epithelial Thickness Mapping in Normal Corneas with Different Types of Astigmatism.

SIGNIFICANCE: Corneal epithelial thickness mapping has a wide range of applications including screening for keratoconus, screening for anterior basement membrane dystrophy, and assessment of dry eye. It also plays an important role in corneal laser refractive surgery. These all require an understanding of the epithelial thickness profile in a normal cornea as a reference. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare corneal epithelial thickness along different meridians in normal eyes with different types of corneal astigmatism. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, corneal topography and epithelial thickness mapping by anterior segment optical coherence tomography was performed for 154 normal eyes. Corneal astigmatism was classified based on the orientation of the steepest corneal meridian (with-the-rule [WTR], against-the-rule [ATR], and oblique) and the amount (low, moderate, and high). On a 9-mm epithelial thickness map, the thickness along the horizontal (180°), vertical (90°), and diagonal (45 and 135°) meridians was calculated. RESULT: With-the-rule, oblique, and ATR astigmatisms were observed in 40, 31, and 29% of the eyes, respectively. In all types of astigmatism, the mean epithelial thickness was greater along the 180° meridian and thinner along the 90° meridian. There was no statistically significant difference in mean thickness along different meridians for WTR (P = .24) and oblique (P = .46) astigmatism, whereas the difference along the 180 and 90° meridians (P = .003) for ATR astigmatism was statistically significant. Also, there was a statistically significant difference in thickness in different types of astigmatism separately for each meridian (P < .05) so that the highest and lowest thicknesses were seen for ATR and oblique astigmatisms, respectively. The epithelial thickness showed no statistical difference in various amounts of astigmatism along different meridians. CONCLUSIONS: Thicker epithelium along the horizontal meridian in ATR may point to the surface regularizing functions of the epithelium to create a regular and smooth surface, but thickness assessment along the different meridians in oblique and WTR showed no curvature-dependent changes.

Comparison of the Amplitude of Accommodation Measured Using a New-Generation Closed-Field Autorefractor with Conventional Subjective Methods.

Purpose: This study aims to compare and assess the agreement of the objective amplitude of accommodation (AA) measured using a new-generation closed-field autorefractor with conventional subjective methods. Methods: In total, 84 healthy individuals with an age range of 19 to 50 years participated in this cross-sectional study. AA was measured objectively with a Nidek autorefractor (AR-1a; Nidek Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and subjectively using push-up (PU) and minus-lens (ML) methods in a random order. Comparison between different methods was performed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test for pairwise comparisons. In addition to the Pearson correlation, the Bland and Altman method and the intraclass correlation coefficient were used to determine the agreement between the three techniques. Only the right-eye results were used for analysis. Results: AA measured using the Nidek autorefractor (3.43 ± 1.94 D) was significantly lower than that measured with PU (7.67 ± 2.38 D; p < 0.001) and ML (7.60 ± 2.81 D; p < 0.001) methods. The difference between the subjective methods was not significant statistically (p = 1.0). The correlation for Nidek measurements and PU and ML methods was moderate (r = 0.5502 and r = 0.6832, respectively), while it was strong when comparing subjective methods (r = 0.7821). The limits of agreement for Nidek vs. PU, Nidek vs. ML, and PU vs. ML methods were −8.28 to −0.23 D, −8.19 to −0.15 D, and −3.38 to 3.51 D, respectively. Conclusions: There was a moderate agreement between AA obtained with subjective methods and objective Nidek measurements. The objective AA measurements obtained with a new Nidek autorefractor were significantly lower than subjective measurements.

Visual outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy in non-children with anisometropic amblyopia: One-year Follow-up Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, efficiency, short term stability, and sensory results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in anisometropic in non-compliant children with correction. METHODS: Twelve eyes of 12 children with an age range: 6-17 years and anisometropic amblyopia who underwent PRK under general anesthesia to correct the dioptric difference between the eyes were included in this study. A complete ophthalmic assessment including refractive status, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA & CDVA), and binocular vision status using the Worth 4-dot test and stereopsis were performed before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after PRK. RESULTS: The mean preoperative CDVA was 0.34 ± 0.24 LogMAR which showed a statistically significant improvement at 12 months (0.20 ± 0.19, p = 0.024) after surgery compared to the preoperative assessment. (p = 0.003) The mean preoperative UDVA was 0.63 ± 0.24 LogMAR that increased to 0.44 ± 0.24, 0.32 ± 0.16, 0.25 ± 0.19, and 0.25 ± 0.19 LogMAR at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after PRK, respectively. One to three lines improvement in UDVA and CDVA was seen in 10 (83.4%) and 8 eyes (66.7%); while one line UDVA and CDVA loss was seen in one (8.3%) and one (8.3%) eye and unchanged UDVA and CDVA was seen in 1 (8.3%) and 3 eyes (25%), respectively. The mean preoperative stereoacuity was 341.9 ± 245.7 s of arc, which significantly improved to 166.6 ± 87.5 s of arc 12 months after PRK. (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: PRK was an effective surgical alternative to improve visual acuity and stereopsis in anisometropic children who did not cooperate with conventional methods of amblyopia therapy.

Randomized contralateral comparison of visual outcomes following implantation of two monofocal aspherical intraocular lenses after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare optical and visual performances of two one-piece aspherical implanted intraocular lenses (IOLs) following phacoemulsification cataract surgery in a contralateral eye study. METHODS: In this prospective randomized parallel-group study, 25 patients with bilateral age-related cataract were implanted in one eye with the EnVista IOL (MX60, Bausch & Lomb Corporations, Rochester, NY, USA) and the Acrysof IQ IOL (Acrysof IQ SN60WF, Alcon Surgical Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA) in the other eye. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), refractive status, higher-orders aberrations (HOAs) in 5 and 6 mm pupil size, contrast sensitivity (CS) with and without glare, color vision status, and patient satisfaction were assessed in the two eyes at 1 and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in CDVA (P > 0.99), UDVA (P = 0.46), spherical equivalent refractive error (P = 0.63), CS with and without glare across different spatial frequencies, color vision, and root mean square (RMS) of aberrometric values between the two IOLs after 3-month follow-up. Spherical aberration with 5 and 6 mm pupil sizes (P = 0.02) and horizontal coma with a 6 mm pupil size (P < 0.001) were lower with the EnVista IOL. Patient's satisfaction showed no cases of dissatisfaction, and most patients were highly or moderately satisfied with both IOLs. CONCLUSION: The visual and optical performance of eyes implanted with the EnVista IOL or the Acrysof IQ IOL was similar, although the aberration profile differed.

Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of dry, and cycloplegic autorefraction and wavefront-based refraction with subjective refraction.Method: 83 subjects aged 19–57 years were included in this cross-sectional study. Refractive status was determined using four methods including subjective refraction, wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction. Refractive data were recorded as sphere, cylinder and spherical equivalent (SE). Power vector components were used to compare the astigmatism obtained using the different methods of refraction.Results: The more negative spherical, cylindrical and SE components were obtained using dry autorefraction, wavefront-based refraction and dry autorefraction, respectively. The less negative spherical, cylindrical and SE components were obtained using cycloplegic autorefraction, subjective refraction and cycloplegic autorefraction, respectively. Considering the spherical component, there was a statistically significant hyperopic shift (0.12 ± 0.29 D, p = 0.001) with cycloplegic autorefraction and a significant myopic shift (−0.17 ± 0.32 D, p < 0.001) with dry autorefraction compared to subjective refraction, while the difference between wavefront-based and subjective refraction was not significant statistically (p = 0.145). The calculated cylindrical component using subjective refraction showed statistically significant difference with dry auto-refraction (p < 0.001), cycloplegic auto-refraction (p = 0.041) and wavefront refraction (p < 0.001). The highest correlation with subjective refraction in sphere, cylinder and SE was observed for cycloplegic auto-refraction (rs = 0.967), dry auto-refraction (rs = 0.983) and cycloplegic auto-refraction (rs = 0.982), respectively.Conclusions: As subjective refraction is gold standard in our study, sphere in cycloplegic auto-refraction and astigmatism in dry auto-refraction showed better agreement and correlation. (AU)

Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement of dry, and cycloplegic autorefraction and wavefront-based refraction with subjective refraction. METHOD: 83 subjects aged 19-57 years were included in this cross-sectional study. Refractive status was determined using four methods including subjective refraction, wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction. Refractive data were recorded as sphere, cylinder and spherical equivalent (SE). Power vector components were used to compare the astigmatism obtained using the different methods of refraction. RESULTS: The more negative spherical, cylindrical and SE components were obtained using dry autorefraction, wavefront-based refraction and dry autorefraction, respectively. The less negative spherical, cylindrical and SE components were obtained using cycloplegic autorefraction, subjective refraction and cycloplegic autorefraction, respectively. Considering the spherical component, there was a statistically significant hyperopic shift (0.12 ±â€¯0.29 D, p = 0.001) with cycloplegic autorefraction and a significant myopic shift (-0.17 ±â€¯0.32 D, p < 0.001) with dry autorefraction compared to subjective refraction, while the difference between wavefront-based and subjective refraction was not significant statistically (p = 0.145). The calculated cylindrical component using subjective refraction showed statistically significant difference with dry auto-refraction (p < 0.001), cycloplegic auto-refraction (p = 0.041) and wavefront refraction (p < 0.001). The highest correlation with subjective refraction in sphere, cylinder and SE was observed for cycloplegic auto-refraction (rs = 0.967), dry auto-refraction (rs = 0.983) and cycloplegic auto-refraction (rs = 0.982), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As subjective refraction is gold standard in our study, sphere in cycloplegic auto-refraction and astigmatism in dry auto-refraction showed better agreement and correlation.

Corneal Stability and Visual Acuity 1 Year After Corneal Cross-linking Assessed Using the ABCD Keratoconus Staging System.

PURPOSE: To assess corneal stability and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) 3, 6, and 12 months following corneal cross-linking (CXL) using the ABCD keratoconus staging system. METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study included 31 eyes with keratoconus receiving CXL based on the standard Dresden protocol. CDVA, refraction, and Scheimpflug tomography with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) were evaluated before and after surgery. Geometric and functional changes were assessed using the actual values and staging of each element of the ABCD keratoconus staging system. A, B, C, and D refer to the anterior and posterior radii of curvature in a 3-mm zone centered on the cor-neal thinnest point, minimum corneal thickness, and CDVA, respectively. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in the actual values of anterior radius of curvature (P = .497) and CDVA (P = .082), whereas posterior radius of curvature (P = .007) and corneal thinnest point (P < .001) showed significant changes statistically. Pairwise comparison showed only a statistically significant steepening in posterior radius of curvature at 3 months after CXL compared to the preoperative radius (P = .002) and a significant decrease in corneal thinnest point at 3 (P < .001) and 6 (P = .028) months after CXL compared to baseline assessment. Staging of each element of the ABCD keratoconus staging system indicated no change between baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after CXL. CONCLUSIONS: The geometric and functional parameters included in the ABCD keratoconus staging system showed stability of corneal status and CDVA 1 year after CXL. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(10):700-706.].